London Calling, George-Michael Produces Documentary about gay-teens

 

“Hello, this is George, ” said the voice on the phone. “George Michael.” The twice-repeated first name, easy familiarity, and British accent reminded me of another iconic greeting (“Bond. James Bond”) Surely, I must be dreaming about this George. George Michael. Then again, this “George Michael” voice triggered memories: “Freedom,” “I Want Your Sex,” and “Club Tropicana.” For a closeted 16-year old driving around in his red Karmann Ghia and loudly singing off-key, George’s songs promised something unspoken, urbane, and sexy. 

Still dreaming, I listened to “George Michael” describe reading my article “Hiding-Out” in Attitude, a U.K. glossy. I got out of bed and looked outside. It was dark. I wasn’t dreaming. George Michael really was telling me, “I was very moved by the story. I want to make a video.” Could I hook him up with the gay-teens who’d escaped from gay-to-straight “hospitals” into an underground network of safe houses?

“No,” I said, taking notes. There were two weeks to find the safe house kids, edit their interviews, and deliver the video (“Freedom, Part 2”?) to RFK Stadium for George’s performance at Equality Rocks. “But I can.”

Problematically, while I knew exactly what I would do for the video, I had no clue about how to actually make a video. No worries — I’m from L.A.; I faked it and George signed on, pop star style, agreeing to pay for everything. His manager, Andy Stephens (now overseeing American Idol winner Susan Boyle), made one thing clear: George Michael Pop Star was paying for this project out of pocket — his pocket. And though those were deep pockets, George Michael the person wasn’t a spendthrift. I had to make every penny count. 

Ninety minutes later, I was dispatched to San Francisco. I done this before — traveled north in search of kids, underground and safe houses. But this time I couldn’t help but wonder, who was I looking for —the kids or me?

When I was a teenager, I’d run away to San Francisco and “life.” I liked the “idea” of the Bay Area and its history of social activism. I was eager to become a vegan and … take modern dance classes! Though I was now an adult who, on occasion, ate meat and had somewhat more defined goals, returning to the Emerald City still made me nervous. I had four days to make a video based an article that took me two years to write. I was, however, sustained by some weird belief that the safe house had once again “chosen” me to tell its story.

I wasn’t completely alone in my quest. John Keitel, a USC film graduate, and I drove to S.F and checked into Beck’s Motor Lodge, a shabby-tawdry-cheap-chic tweaker destination. Crucially, Beck’s was centrally located, near the Tenderloin.

That night we drove to Polk, where commerce thrived 24/7, all of it human: sex and drugs. Same as the local predators, we circled blocks, on the hunt. The kids ran away from us, darting around corners and hiding in dark alleys. 

“Pull over,” I said. Across the street, I saw kids getting high. John parked. We discussed approaching “them.” The group was clustered in a parking structure lit by nauseating citrus-yellow lights. “No,” I said. “Let’s not.” Driving away, I knew we’d just passed on a great opportunity. One of those kids must have contact with a safe house. But I’d become afraid and told myself, It’s too dangerous.

We returned to Beck’s without footage. I lay down on the lumpy mattress and looked left, at the digital clock. The red numbers flipped. I started counting: three days to tape, four to edit, hours to fly and deliver. Already we were out of time. In the other bed, John ate chips and watched TV. I looked at the camera. It sat in the chair, stubborn, glum and dead. Before, all I needed was paper, pen, and pluck. Now I was at the mercy of a cyclops. I rolled off the polyester bedspread and picked up the lens cap, ready to turn the top.

A knock on the door. I paused. A shadow was outlined on the curtain. John and I exchanged glances. We hadn’t ordered room service — there wasn’t room service at Beck’s. “I’ll deal with it,” I said, prepared to shoo away one of the roving zombie tweakers, and opened the door. “Listen … ” A boy stood in the breezeway, his face hidden in the shadows. A duffel bag was slung over his left shoulder. 

He smiled, shy. “Hi,” Chad Brian said, in a heavily adenoidal voice. Miraculously, our first subject had flown from Florida and delivered himself to our room. Now, I thought, taking his bag and ushering him into the room, we begin.

The next day, we drove to the Tenderloin and ditched the car. Chad Brian’s presence jolted me into the realization that the safe house documentary couldn’t be made at a remove. More so, “Hiding Out” demanded me to reinvest myself in a topic I was pained to revisit.

We were walking down Polk Street when I looked away and down a cross street. I saw a girl walking away, skateboard hooked under right hand. Something made me shout, “Excuse me!” She ignored me. “Deeth!” Chad Brian yelled. She turned and looked. The clock was still ticking, but we now had our second interview. Marci (who’d run safe houses) and National Center for Lesbian Rights attorney Shannon Minter followed.

The days blurred. We left the roachy motel, returned to L.A. and edited “”Hiding-Out.” John left the post-production house, video in hand, late for his flight to D.C. I was done. Or was I? For the second time, “Hiding-Out”  left me with a sense of accomplishment but not completion. 

Chad Brian’s unlikely yet perfectly timed appearance at Beck’s was our project’s desperately needed turning point. He was the catalyst for “Hiding-Out” I saw myself reflected in Chad Brian. Like me, he’d been ground up by the psychiatric industry’s voracious appetite for money and gay teenagers. Like me, Chad Brian was forever searching to redeem himself from his horrific experience. And, like me, Chad Brian was a brave young gay person who carried on despite having every reason in the world to curl up and die.

Chad Brian’s presence reminded me why I was here in San Francisco. “Hiding-Out”  wasn’t about a pop star or money. Nor was “Hiding-Out” (and, later, Hidden) about “issues” — safe houses, runaway youth, reparative therapy. “”Hiding-Out”— and now Hidden — was always about survival and survivors. I’d always kept my distance from the kids, convincing myself it had something to do with “impartiality.” Yet on some level I knew from whence those detached feelings sprang — I just couldn’t deal with their source. Namely, all my buried feelings of shame and self-loathing that were triggered every time I dealt with the kids. They were, in essence, reminders of the passage of time and the unacknowledged reality that certain facts of my life were immutable, and still very much alive.

As time passed and I disengaged from the safe house story, another question emerged: Would I ever truly be free of the persistent feeling that I’d failed? Because I was dogged by the feeling that, despite all my best efforts and good intentions, I’d failed the kids. Because, really, nothing had changed. I’d spent a chunk of my life on something for results that were at best indefinable.

Curiously, it was only when I turned away from nonfiction and wrote (the fictional) Hidden that I was finally able to face the truth. A truth that had nothing to do with the safe house story’s failure to change laws or the underwhelming response of the LGBT “community.” Often I blamed the (adult) LGBT community, who either couldn’t deal with its own deeply buried pain (everyone who’s gay was a gay youth). Or, in my then still young mind, turned me into an observer of “adult” issues braided with pleasure and death (the AIDS epidemic was then in full swing.) 

Years later, when I opened my first copy of Hidden, I read the first lines— “I am high” —and was finally able to see the truth of what I’d been searching for all those years. Safe / House — or, like everyone from Odysseus to Dorothy, safety and home. For me, the safe house story had been my personal search for redemption — ultimately, not for “the kids,” but my own still broken teenage self.

Read the Publisher’s Weekly review of “hidden” here

Are You a Friend of Azealia-Banks?

When I was in high school, I wrote a one-act play that won the Scholastic Writing Award, in a category that was judged by Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright (The Effect of Gamma Ray on May-in-the-Moon MarigoldsPaul Zindel. I don’t know what Zindel’s play is actually about — LSD? Flowers? Early Electric Daisy Carnival? — because I am still so dazzled by his Pulitzer. But it didn’t matter — my play apparently was good enough to warrant recognition and Zindel picked right on one count: I became a published author, and wrote a novel (hidden) about queer teens who escape from gay-to-straight bootcamps.

At the time, the Scholastic award was announced close enough to graduation that I could keep my play’s content (a queer boy struggling to come to terms with his sexuality) a secret. Nobody knew what my play was about until after I graduated, when I left a copy under a classmate’s front door. That summer, Eric — armed with a bigger mouth than Azealia-Banks‘ — ran around town announcing, “Tomas Mournian’s come out of the closet! Tomas Mournian’s come out of the closet!” (a comment that provoked another friend to wryly observe, “Tomas Mournian’s closet is everyone else’s living room.”)

So yesterday, when I happened to see a post on LAMBDA Literary about the Los Angeles LGBT Heritage Month Writing Contest, I was immediately intrigued by the idea that queer teenagers were being invited to write about their life experiences … while they were still in school. What was even more astonishing to me was that this contest was being sponsored through a joint effort between America’s first Latino Mayor (Antonio Villaraigosa), The City of Los Angeles and Toyota. 

Los Angeles LGBT Heritage Month 2012 Writing Contest

 

The contest encourages queer youth to make a video or write — poem, essay, short story — a creative work connecting to their life with a larger history. And then there’s the cash and prizes. First, second and third place winners will receive $1,000, $600 and $400, plus tickets to Disneyland. There’s also other stuff that promises to make the contest worth entering even if you don’t place in the top three — and, yes, just likeRuPaul’s Drag Race, the competition promises to be fierce.

Last year, Dustin Lance Black (who won an Oscar for Milk – a movie I did see) presented the winner of the LGBT Heritage month creative writing contest to Eliot Sitz, a tenth grader at Downtown Magnet High school.

You can check out Eliott’s blog here; it features pictures of him with Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Margaret Cho, among others, at a garden party. Eliot’s impossible to miss: he’s the one wearing a bright pink shirt and board shorts, and sporting a flawless faux hawk. Eliot was also recognized by the Mayor during a City Council meeting and received a VIP package from L.A. Gay Pride and tickets to Disneyland.  

Find out more about the contest on Facebook 
and check out video of Elliott’s performance below:

Read Tracy Nectoux’s American Library Assocation review of “hidden” here.

My Date with Catherine Deneuve

 

Catherine Deneuve autographed "Belle de Jour" picture

 

I met Catherine Deneuve on the 12th Floor of the Four Seasons Beverly Hills for the rereleased of Belle De Jour. Deneuve was everything you’d imagine: beautiful, cool and, surprisingly, very funny.

When I asked her my question, “What’s the sexiest gift you’ve ever received?” Deneuve’s face broken into a smile, seemingly relieved to get a question that wasn’t about film theory (or, Luis Buñuel.)

“It was wild, man,” Catherine Deneuve said. “I walked into this house, and the whole wall was covered with flowers. White …”

I’m writing from memory – the flowers were either white roses or calla lilies. But did it matter? The Belle de Jour title is the French name of the daylily (literally: “daylight beauty”), a flower that blooms only during the day, but also refers to a prostitute whose trade is conducted in daytime.

The Washington Post reviews “hidden” by Tomas-Mournian

 

Washington Post Summer Reading Round-Up, illustration by Jack Black

The Washington Post features Katie Aberbach’s The Next Chapter’s a summer reading round-up that gives a new spin to the best beach book. The list suggests adults check out 12 hot books in 4 categories – and none of them are Twilight or, Jackie Collins. The Washington Post features everything from Realistic (“hidden” ), to Historical Fiction (“Falling in Love With English Boys” by Melissa Jensen), Classics ( “Jane” by April Lindner) and Fantasy (“Fire” by Kristin Cashore.) I’m excited I made it into the paper that published both Sally Quinn, and the Pentagon Papers. This means I’m either destined for seven weeks on network TV news, or hidden will become a movie directed by the new Sydney Lumet.

Mitt-Romney, Gay-Teens, & Reparative Therapy

Mitt-Romney bullied gay teen

Mitt-Romney-Bully

When singer George Michael hired me to produce “Hiding Out,” a video about LGBTQ youth sent to gay-to-straight boot camps, I doubt he had any idea the documentary short would later become another keyhole into Mitt Romney’s psyche (or the basis for my novel, hidden.) For there was one crucial fact missing in the Washington Post’s recent expose about the Lord of the Flies-like story featuring Mitt Romney leading the vicious bullying of John Lauber, a presumed gay student at Michigan’s Cranbrook School. That little known connection links Romney the adult to for-profit bullying, and emerged during Mitt Romney’s 2007 presidential campaign through one of Romney’s most successful fundraisers, Robert Lichfield. The subject of multiple lawsuits alleging fraud and child abuse, Lichfield was the owner of WASPS a.k.a., Teen Help, a company that made millions referring parents to behavior modification camps including those that targeting parents who wanted to convert their gay teenagers to straight.

Before signing onto Romney’s 2007 presidential campaign, Lichfield already knew the value of political patronage – he’d reaped its material rewards. In January 2007, journalist Maia Szalavitz reported on Reason.com about Lichfield approaching Marty Stephens, speaker of the Utah House of Representatives. In 2004, Stephens had used a procedural maneuver to block a vote on legislation, which, as Szalavitz writes, “backers say had more than enough support to pass, imposing stricter controls on a WWASP facility near Randolph, Utah. Six days later, he received a check from Robert Lichfield for his gubernatorial campaign.” According to Szalzvitz, “Lichfield insisted to the Salt Lake Tribune that ‘that check had nothing to do with’ the bill’s blockage. He added: ‘I’d like to use my means and resources to bless people’s lives. Does that also imply influencing policy makers to make good policies that support good family values, quality education, and the things I believe in? Definitely.’”

The subject of numerous lawsuits alleging child abuse, Lichfield “voluntarily” resigned from the Romney campaign on September 7, 2007, after years of serving Romney as a Utah finance committee co-chairman. A top Romney campaign fundraiser, Lichfield and Mel Sembler, former owner of Straight, Inc., were two of several Romney supporters with ties to reparative therapy and/or behavior modification bootcamp-schools. In February 2007, the Utah based Litchfield had passed the hat at an event in St. George (Utah.), collecting over $300,000 in donations for the failed campaign of Romney, then-GOP presidential candidate. (Members of the Litchfield family personally contributed $17,000 to Romney’s unsuccessful campaign.)

“Gov. Romney has asked Mr. Lichfield to step down and not be involved in any more fundraising until the lawsuit is resolved in the positive, which we are confident will happen,” Ken Kay said (Kay being a co-defendent with Lichfield in multiple lawsuits alleging child abuse.) One such complaint was filed on September 7th, 2007 in U.S. District Court in Utah. In it, 140 plaintiffs named Lichfield in the federal lawsuit alleging that students of the schools associated with WWASPS were subjected to “physical abuse, emotional abuse and sexual abuse.” Radar’s John Cook reported, “The lawsuit alleged one plaintiff, Chase Wood, ‘claims he was fondled, forced to eat his own vomit, and locked in a dog cage at the Cross Creek Center for Boys, a school that Lichfield founded in the late 1970s.’” Another WASPS / Lichfield owned Samoa “school” was shut down following a U.S. State Department-led investigation which found “credible allegations of physical abuse” including “beatings, isolation, food and water deprivation, choke-holds, kicking, punching, bondage, spraying with chemical agents, forced medication, [and] verbal abuse.”

A year earlier, the details of Lichfield’s financial empire had been revealed in a class-action lawsuit brought against him for fraud in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of New York. The lawsuit alleged that Lichfield and several partners defrauded people by operating an unlicensed boarding school in upstate New York According to the lawsuit, Lichfield then made $90 million a year through a network of businesses that focused on “referring” parents of gay teens (and teens in general) to behavior modification “schools.”

The week before Lichfield resigned, Randall Hinton, an counselor who has worked at the Lichfield owned Cross Creek and many other schools affiliated with WWASP, was convicted of third-degree assault and false imprisonment for slamming the head of a 15-year-old student at Royal Gorge Academy in Colorado into a stairwell and forcing a 17-year-old to lie flat on his stomach for so long he had to vomit. Hinton faced up to three years in prison.

Read Sassafras Lowrey‘s LAMBDALiterary.org review of “hidden” here

Tomas Mournian @ Literary-Orange 2012

Tomas-Mournian at Literary-Orange-2012
Tomas-Mournian at Literary-Orange-2012

I’m excited about appearing this Saturday (April 14th, 11:30 a.m.) on a panel w/ Louis B. Jones, @ the Literary Orange 2012. “Discovering New Possibilities” will be moderated by Ryan Gattis during the all-day event at UC Irvine.

Read Richard LaBonte’s Book Marks review of “hidden” here

Love After Love, a poem by Derek Walcott

 

 

Love After Love, a poem by Derek Walcott

 

Love After Love 


The time will come
when, with elation,
you will greet yourself arriving
at your own door, in your own mirror,
and each will smile at the other’s welcome,

and say, sit here. Eat. 
You will love again the stranger who was  your self.
Give wine. Give bread. Give back your heart
to itself, to the stranger has loved you

all your life, whom you ignored
for another, who knows you by heart.
Take down the love letters from the bookshelf,

the photographs, the desperate notes,
peel your own image from the mirror.
Sit. Feast on your life. 

- Derek Walcott

Recovery 2012: Overcoming Being an Los Angeles Yoga Snob

 

Yogi Mournian: Warrior One

 

The story of this photo: a few days before 2011 became 2012, Forever Barbie (the unauthorized biography) author M.G. Lord asked, “Despite my allergy to self-help literature, I welcome suggestions for self-improvement. In anticipation of the new year, Theresa Senft asked her friends what one thing they did, or what person they met, or what book they read, or what activity they tried that improved their lives in 2011. Which makes me wonder: What did you do last year that made your life better?And would you mind please sharing it with me?”

My answer: “Besides rereading Don Miguel Ruiz’ The Four Agreements (a water-logged copy found  returning from Runyon Canyon), I restarted yoga classes, after several years of practicing OMO. I’d become a yoga snob, & came to believe good meant expensive i.e., $20 or thereabouts for class.

“But recently, I found that what all those exclusive yoga classes & teachers training meant that a ‘class’ isn’t so much about the perfect pigeon, handstand, whatever so much as a practice done in the presence of others.

“And finally, I’ve surrendered to the idea that yoga is not, as it’s often conceived of in Los Angeles, exercise, but really truly about asana (physical poses) that follow the breath as a means of attaining (hopefully) a meditative state.”

Occupy Anywhere

 

Occupy Portland or Wherever

 

When I woke up on November 18, 2011 and read about the early, friday morning evacuation of the Zuccotti Park occupation, I worried that it represented a terminal end point to the Occupy Wall Street Movement.  But later than afternoon, I walked into the gym on Friday, and saw Reverend Al Sharpton’s face on thirty-two television screens. Sharpton’s avuncular presence foregrounded images showing thousands of protestors crossing the Brooklyn Bridge. Maybe my worries about rumors of the movement’s impending collapse were for naught. 

If Reverend Al was back – and appearing live on MSNBC (flashing back/forward from the 80′s, I wouldn’t have been surprised to see Tawana Brawley’s  name flash on the chiron {“Calling from Wappinger, New York, Hello Tawana!”}) – then anything was possible. And while “Occupy Wall Street” had been “evicted” – in the literal sense of the word – the afternoon protests suggested the movement had outgrown its original place, moved beyond Zuccotti Park’s original borders, metastasized and become a national state of mind.

This question of  place remained very much on my mind while I worked out that afternoon at Crunch. The gym “occupies” two floors of a strip mall on the corner of Sunset & Crescent Heights Boulevards, across the street from the legendary “Garden of Allah” and on the spot of Schwab’s Pharmacy. These places are all “in,” as locals say, ”Hollywood,” iconic locales that  once entertained more overt egalitarian sensibilities: 

“It was unique among local hot spots in that it welcomed business from all rungs of the film industry ladder, and everyone was treated with equal deference. In the ’30s and ’40s you could spot Judy Garland, Mickey Rooney, Orson Welles, Ida Lupino, the Marx and Ritz Brothers, Marilyn Monroe, and Ronald Reagan rubbing shoulders with the rabble here. Chaplin and Harold Lloyd came to play the pinball machines, and it was a favorite trysting place for F. Scott Fitzgerald and his lover Sheilah Graham. Schwab’s was particularly solicitous of Tinseltown’s “underemployed”; credit was guaranteed, and struggling young performers could always drop in for a free meal. One of them, Ava Gardner, landed a job behind the soda fountain while waiting for her big break”

That evening, I read an article about the events on the ground at Zuccotti Park. In the piece, Princeton Professor Cornel West addressed the general anxiety – or, hope, depending – about OWS’ do-or-die moment: “There’s already been a victory. Everyone is talking about corporate greed and income inequality, and that wouldn’t have been imaginable even a year ago.” … ““you can’t evict an idea whose time has come.” 

West’s words gave me pause. In the last month, Occupy Wall Street had – more than ACT-UP or the Immigration Rights Marches – provoked a fundamental shift my consciousness. Two months ago, standing in a grocery store, I flipped through Adbusters, glancing at a quarter page ad (“Occupy Wall Street: September 17, 2011.”) It’s been amazing to witness a call to arms become something big enough to temporarily halt our country’s dismaying slide into total decadence. Suddenly, a whole range of unspoken issues were crowding the space of public discourse: workers rights, class, money and the financial industry’s morally indefensible winner-takes-all mentality. 

*

For the last two months, I’ve been mesmerized by how OWS’ tactics instantaneously rendered “lifestyle” completely ridiculous. While an Iraq veteran was shot in Oakland,  The View’s Elizabeth Hasselback was shrilly “taking down” Bill Maher for statements he’d made in February. The clip went quasi viral on Gawker and HuffPo (and Jezebel, though the latter’s response registered as bored indignation) before vanishing in the ether of, Like, um, who cares?

In contrast with Hasselback’s dithering, n+1 writer Marco Roth’s “Mayor Bloomberg’s Language” was skillfully taking apart statements that actually mattered: Bloomberg’s “charges” against OWS (“Here begins a litany of charges against the protesters, which, as they multiply, become increasingly incoherent and contradictory.”)

 I was fascinated by the failure of vigilant efforts of the “1%,” people like New York City’s Mayor, Michael Bloomberg, to “defeat” the OWS. Occupy Wall Street casually defied the Right’s need for an “enemy.” The Right’s escalating criticism that Occupy Wall Street lacked a list of demands revealed the extent to which it drove Republicans bat shit crazy.  The movement’s lack of definition beautifully underscored the degree to which Bloomberg’s decision failed, doing more to move Occupy ______ (whatever you wanted) into our collective consciousness than any “eviction.”  

Bloomberg’s claims (“make no mistake—the final decision to act was mine”) ultimately served the inchoate goals of Occupy Wall Street. At the gym and on YouTube, I was watching power’s death by a million papers cuts. There was no “evicting” the subsequent flurry of images disgorged by the excess of police force. That those images can be known without being seen but just described attests to their iconic nature: “the bloodied face of the boy in New York City” and “the pepper sprayed student in Portland.”

These were the sort of events / images that would have once been chronicled by Joan Didion, a writer whose ear has always been attuned to the politics of place. Didion’s absence from her famous “facts on the ground” revealed another shift, one in the free-floating state of belle lettres. While Didion was preoccupied (as it were) with promoting her latest book, Blue Nights,  the novelist Dana Spiotta moved into Didion’s place.

There, Spiotta described the movement in a way that I had once associated with Didion (perfectly nuanced, definitive) in the deft, “Occupy Wall Street: More Than a State of Mind”: “Then there is that word, occupy. It isn’t Protest Wall Street. Occupy is a much more specific word. It has its roots in the Latin verb occupare, which means to seize or capture.  So although it is a nonviolent protest, the word is aggressive and warlike. Protesters have long appropriated war terms, and I understand that is a way of appropriating power. I admit I do have a little trouble reconciling the commitment to consensus and democracy with the martial language.  Yet I understand that the militaristic connotation of the word projects the anger people feel. It galvanizes people and makes them feel formidable. And it also points to the endless duration that is a big part of an occupation’s power.

To occupy also means to engage someone’s attention.  Occupy Wall Street means making Wall Street and the corporate power elite understand that the people affected by the binge of unregulated greed are not going away, and they are not going to give up.  Occupation also means employment.  The Occupy protests give the unemployed something to do.  They are occupied with protest, political engagement, and justice. One of my favorite signs from Zuccatti Park reads “Lost my job, found an occupation.” 

Wizard of Oz’s Dorothy Does Shoefiti

Wizard of Oz's Dorothy does Shoefiti in West Hollywood, California

 

I took this pic of (hard to see but they were) glittery gold heels tossed over a power wire on Crescent Heights Blvd.  The gesture is known as Shoefiti. Wikipedia cites shoefiti as “a gang-related murder, or the death of a gang member.” Which made me wonder: there’s a Dorothy Gale Gang in West Hollywood?  Or, bored looking for the Wizard of Oz, Dorothy Gale ditched her gang, and got jumped into a new one?